Monet’s Gardens in Giverny

In class we have been discussing the many different ways in which an archaeological site can be displayed as an exhibit.  Although it may not exactly be an archaeological site, Monet’s Gardens in Giverny is a great example of how some exhibits, like the St. Mary’s exhibit in Maryland, take the approach of recreating the site as it was in the past.

Monet’s gardens and house in Giverny was the home of the French impressionist painter, Claude Monet and his family.  The gardens were inspiration for many of Monet’s famous works including Bridge over a Pond of Water Lilies (1899).  Many years after Monet had passed and the property remained neglected by the family, it was finally in 1977 that Gérald van der Kemp was appointed curator at Giverny by the Academie des Beaux-Arts.  After about 10 years of restoration the property was well suited for visitors.  The idea behind the restoration process was to make the property look very similar to its original form.

There are currently many gardeners staffed to keep up the appearance of the garden throughout the year.  When I visited, everything was green because it was the summertime, so the gardens were not nearly as colorful as the gardens in Monet’s paintings, however still incredibly beautiful.  There were simple paths leading around the pond that Monet had painted.  Visitors could also stand on the bridge that Monet painted and take pictures.  The lilies, which are essentially to recreating Monet’s scene of the pond, were also being tended to by a gardener in a green boat (as seen in the picture).  In front of the house there were many thick gardens full of a variety of multicolored flowers and thin dirts paths among the plots leading to the modest yet brightly colored ivy covered house.

 

The house was clearly restored and polished, however maintained the essence of the French countryside. Some of the furniture I believe was actually used by Monet and his family and underwent restoration.  Visitors could walk through the house and see a completely furnished sun-filled bedroom, a bright yellow kitchen, and living room.  The living room walls were lined with Monet’s paintings from ceiling to floor, left to right.  A painting resting on an easel was located in the corner of the room giving the room a sense of life and a relationship to the painter who once lived there.  For me, it gave the space an emotive quality.  When exiting the property visitors were first led into a large gift shop with a very high ceiling that sold jewelry, prints of Monet’s paintings, art books, etc…  I visited with a bus tour (because that’s how my family rolls) and the gardens themselves were not crowded but within the house and gift shop it was pretty packed.

Overall it was an amazing visit.  I really enjoyed the recreation of the property – it was definitely an effective way of showing the site to the public.  It is also obviously a very popular museum.  According to the website, <giverny.org>, approximately 500,000 guests visit this museum annually!  The pictures here are from my visit they depict the pond, the gardens, and the house.

 

(First image is from <http://0.tqn.com/d/arthistory/1/0/r/S/mfp_mma_17.jpg> )

 

Review of Colonial Williamsburg’s Online Exhibit, “Mapping Colonial America”

I have chosen to review the “Mapping Colonial America” online exhibit on the Colonial Williamsburg website.  The home page of the actually Colonial Williamsburg website consists of scrolling images that relate to a number of really cool blogs and articles relating to colonial US history.  Among these links is also access to a page titled “Help Preserve America’s History,” allowing site visitors to make donations.

 

To access the exhibit, one must click a link title “Museums” and from there click “Online Exhibits and Multimedia.”  That page then lays out links to the online exhibits including a summary of each one.  I have chosen to focus on the online exhibits, “Mapping Colonial America,” which discusses and displays colonial maps from the collection at Colonial Williamsburg.

The multimedia presentation first displays a home page with the title of the exhibit with a sketch of a ship and what appears to be an old compass.  This presentation is based on the book “Degrees of Latitude: Mapping Colonial America,” written by Margaret Beck Pritchard and Henry G. Taliaferro.  The presentation display twenty-two maps with a variety of views as well as a brief description of each.  At the top of the page, there a number of topics including “Discovery & Exploration,” briefly discussing the importance and use of maps in colonial America.  The other topics include “Boundary Disputes,” “Navigation &Trade,” “French & Indian War,” “Revolutionary War,” and a “New Nation.”  These topics set the stage for the exhibit, giving an essence to and providing a context for the maps on display.

When clicking “got to maps,” the viewer can begin in 1701 viewing a map entitled “A New Map of Virginia, Maryland, Pensilvania, New Jersey, Part of New York, and Caroline.”  On the bottom of the page is a timeline with marks indicating the time period of the rest of the maps, giving the viewer a sense of where they are in the timeline of colonial American maps.  To the left is a more specific timeline relating to the date the map was created offering information of important events that occurred in colonial America.  On the right is information about the map itself such as the creator of the map, their profession, when the map was created, where it was created, and some interesting facts about it.  The presentation also allows the viewer to click on the map for more specific information about it as well as alternative ways to view the map including close ups of writing on the map.  The viewer may also zoom in on the actual map, which is pretty cool because it allows the viewer to have a more personal experience with the artifact allowing for closer exploration and observation.

I personally really enjoyed this exhibit.  I feel that this multimedia presentation did a great job of condensing relevant information and putting it in one accessible place.  I thought the exhibit was well organized in that the viewer could look through all of the maps but could also click on a map for further information about it.  The number of settings and different ways to view the map were effective as, and I think maybe create a greater impact than seeing the artifact in person.  I say this because the way in which the images are set up, give the viewer an idea of what to look for on the map.  However, I think that this exhibit would be pretty confusing for someone who is not super tech savvy.  I also wish there was a comments section or something like that to offer a place for community discussion.