Reading all of the pieces regarding English Language Learners I began to reflect on an experience I had with such students this summer that seems to contradict all of the positive strategies that the readings espoused. This past summer I worked on the residential staff at a summer boarding school with a student body of roughly 200. A large number of these students were ELL. I had three ELL students under my direct supervision, one from China and two from South Korea. Additionally there were massive Arabic and Spanish speaking populations among the students at this school. Looking back on that experience what really strikes me is how oppressive the school was of these students using their first language among themselves in conversation. As a member of the residential staff I was told to both monitor and stop any and all conversations taking place in any language other than English. The idea was that these students were here to learn English and speaking their native language was nothing but detrimental. It seems that the school felt a greater responsibility to the parents’ paid tuitions than to the students themselves.
Unlike what was suggested in the readings, these students were not able to use their primary language as a scaffold for learning English. They were discouraged from speaking in a language that made them comfortable when many of them were thousands of miles from home in a strange place. How alienated they must have felt and the school’s policy of oppressing primary language use did nothing but enforce this alienation. Following these readings I am frankly disgusted and very concerned by the oppressive policies I was tasked with enforcing. Why not allow a student to use any tool at their disposal when trying to learn an unfamiliar language? This response may have become more of a rant but I believe it gets to the point that there is absolutely no reason to discourage primary language use by ELL students, as literacy arises from any language not only from English.