The Western world considered Egypt to be one of the greatest civilization in history. Most of its fame arose from the sense of wonderment surrounding its massive pyramids, and from its legendary people and histories. Cleopatra was a main figure that American children learn about when they first begin to discuss Egypt. The fall of her empire was often attributed to the Roman victory over Egypt in the Battle of Actium in 30 B.C.. Whereas this loss was previously comprehended by conditioned notions of Egyptian weakness through infighting, decadence, and incest, recent archaeological findings hinted that the environment and climate may have had a larger impact on the outcome of the battle. Evidence from ice core data, Islamic records of the water levels in the Nile River, and “ancient Egyptian histories” written on papyrus suggested that a volcanic eruption in 44 B.C. had a massive impact on the stability of Egypt under Cleopatra’s reign.
The result of the eruption was widespread vulnerability. The intrusive eruption disrupted the flooding of the Nile River, thus impacting agriculture, trade, and social organization. Famine ensued due to lack of fertility in local soils to produce essential crops and sustenance for consumption and trading. Additionally, immune systems severely declined with the lack of proper nutrition or energy, which contributed to the widespread disease and famine which swept the nation. Lastly, social unrest surrounding the irregular patterns of the river caused strained trade and social relations between groups of people and caused either conflict or the need for migration. All of these consequences of the volcanic eruption in 44 B.C. contributed to the immense vulnerability of Egypt at the time, making Cleopatra’s reign less authoritative, and making it easier for the Roman empire to claim victory over Egypt in the Battle of Actium in 30 B.C..
I found this finding interesting because it proved the necessity of critical thinking and revisitation of academia’s previously conceived notions and ideas surrounding political and social phenomena. While infighting, decadence, and incest may have contributed to the instability that Egypt felt at the time, it was important to search for more context in order to reveal clues about the rise and fall of “past” civilizations and empires. Looking at history with such a critical lens could elucidate perceptions of the future cycle of empires in the world and help to understand the meanings behind and implications of international interactions today.
Sources and Additional Readings:
Droughts and famines are a common occurrence in the history of many cultures and states, yet many of these are still around today. Is there ever just one cause for a collapse? or is it like in this case a multitude of reasons that cause unrest and collapse of a society?
Droughts and famine are a common occurrence, and I wanted to point out that a historically thriving state, like the Egyptian Dynasty, can fall from the same causes as any other empire today. Of course, external pressures have a layering impact on the outcome these events. Drought and famine are just two natural events that snowball into several other types of conflict, whether they be economic, political, or social. Any stress on a society will cause conflict in such a way that threatens its stability and power. There is never just one cause for a collapse — often, several factors contribute to the fall of a society, and these factors tend to build on each other until the pressure becomes too much and something has got to give. When this happens, a space opens up either in the global community, or locally, for new voices to be heard.