New Faces in the Library: Arianna Schlegel

Last September, Vassar College Libraries welcomed a new librarian, Arianna Schlegel.

 Q. What work do you do at Vassar College Libraries?

I am the Metadata & Systems Librarian, which is a new role here at the library. I help take care of many of the software systems that keep our library running, especially our online catalog so that patrons can look up materials, locate them in our vast collection, and then check them out. I also support systems like those that run some of our research websites and our interlibrary loan, so I am lucky to get to work with a lot of different areas of the library, which I love.

Q. Have you worked at other libraries before coming to Vassar?

I worked at several academic libraries in Connecticut – two of the state universities, and one community college. Before that, my only “library job” prior to library school was actually here, in Vassar’s Art Library – I reshelved books during the winter break of my junior year! I must admit, more often than not you could find me with my nose buried in one of the books that I was supposed to be shelving…I learned so much about art and art history that winter!

Q. What did you do there, and how is it different from your work here?

I have been lucky enough to have had the chance to try my hand at a bunch of different aspects of library science. At Central Connecticut State University, I got to really dig into the digital collections, particularly the CT Gay & Lesbian Film Festival archives, and was able to create exhibits and code custom pages using APIs. At Capital Community College, I got to customize the online catalog and work as a reference librarian, which included sitting the desk and teaching information literacy classes. And at Western Connecticut State University, I got to focus on electronic resource access and website redesign. I really loved all of the things I’ve gotten to try, and I think that variety of experiences has really informed the beginning of my work here at Vassar.

Q. Why do you like (or not like) working in libraries?

I am an information sponge. I want to always, always be learning, a little bit about as much as I can, and I feel that libraries are the best venue for that! Working with people who are performing research on topics I am unfamiliar with just forces me outside of my known comfort zone and I feel as if I learn something new every day, something I might not have encountered outside of the library world. And of course, working at a library feeds my literature addiction.

Q. What are your interests outside of work?

I am an obsessive knitter and compulsive reader (so perhaps a somewhat stereotypical librarian? — but, I don’t own any cats!).  I have been known to binge-watch Netflix. And I love to bake. I dabble in small electronics, as well (I am passionate about bringing makerspaces in to libraries, as I feel they are an ideal match). Mostly, in line with my library tastes, if I can learn anything new, I love to give it a try. It might not always be up my alley, but I never know unless I check it out.

Q. You have an adorable dog.  Tell us about her!

Her name is Fall – not, as I originally assumed, because of her fawn-colored fur, but because she is, in fact, a total klutz. She is an Akita, quite small for her breed, which is a blessing for me because she can be a handful at times! Despite being almost 7 years old, she still looks like a puppy, so I can’t ever stay mad at her for long.

Misbehaving: Artists’ Books by Women Artists in the Art Library

Exhibition on View in the Main Reading Room of the Vassar College Art Library

March 6 – April 20, 2015

For the next several weeks the Art Library is privileged to present to the Vassar community an exhibition of artists’ books entitled “Misbehaving: Artists’ Books by Women Artists,” on view through April 20. All but one of the works in the exhibit are from the personal collection a visionary librarian and curator who helped to establish the artist’s book as a significant art form, former Walker Art Center librarian Rosemary Furtak, who passed away in 2012. Among these are works by many artists who have contributed to conversations about the role of women in art and society in recent decades, including Ida Applebroog, Barbara Kruger, Joan Lyons, Laurie Simmons, Jessica Diamond, and Kiki Smith. Collectively these works provide a window into the development of the artist’s book from its early days in the 1960’s and 70’s through to the present. They also illustrate the medium’s gradual incorporation into mainstream museum culture and its literature, thanks in part to Furtak and a small handful of art librarians who followed her lead as a collector and early proponent of the genre.

Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 11.13.49 PM

III (3 Wishbones in a Wood Box). Lorna Simpson. Mixed media, 1994.

As Grace Sparapani (VC’16), who curated “Misbehaving,” writes in the exhibition brochure, just what an artist’s book is as a category “is hard to pin down,” and is sometimes defined by negation: “whatever isn’t anything else,” in the words of the feminist critic Lucy Lippard. Librarians and museum curators found artists’ books strange, and were perplexed as to what to do with them. To curators, although many were being produced by artists who worked in traditional media such as Ed Ruscha and Sol LeWitt, the works seemed unexhibitable and, produced in editions of many copies as multiples, purposely designed to undermine the cult status of the art object and the economics of the art market in their low cost and modest formats. To librarians, they seemed difficult to use and to integrate into conventional collections. Ruscha’s Twentysix Gasoline Stations, for instance, was often classified and shelved with books about transportation. Furtak captures something of the crux of the problem in her own definition of an artists’ book: “An artist’s book is a book that refuses to behave like a normal book.”

Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 11.14.14 PM

Food for Thought.  Jessica Diamond.  Mixed media, 1990.

When she arrived at the Walker in 1983, Furtak discovered the museum’s handful of artists’ books had indeed been placed in museum storage, unlikely to ever be used or exhibited. She “liberated” (her word) these misbehaving books from isolation and obscurity and brought them into her library. In accord with conceptual artists of her generation such as George Maciunas and Lawrence Weiner (whose “BITS AND PIECES PUT TOGETHER TO FORM A SEMBLANCE OF A WHOLE” graces the current facade of the Walker), Furtak addressed the problem of the artist’s book by deploying them just as its early makers understood the work of art itself: as bearers of conversations that artists conduct with one another and with whomever else may be listening. She therefore treated them as living documents by giving them face time with the other art books on her library’s shelves, incorporating them into the library collection and exhibiting them on empty shelves and tabletops, and eventually her extraordinary exhibit case (see Flickr), wherever and whenever she could. In doing so she demonstrated that artists’ books could be integrated into a conventional collection as usable documents, and also that artists’ books could make interesting and visually striking exhibits.

Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 11.13.38 PM

Plegable. Adislen Reyes Pino.  Ink on folded board, 2005.

Furtak also began adding avidly to the collection. Beginning with a check of $500.00 given to her by Sol LeWitt as a start-up stimulus, she gradually built up one of the most important museum collections of artists’ books in the world. And as Walker curator Siri Engberg describes, Furtak’s library was soon transformed from a “quiet corner in the building” into the institution’s “nerve center,” and a place of connection and discovery for artists, curators, and other researchers. During the same period the Walker gained a reputation for being the most dynamic and influential exhibiting institution devoted to modern and contemporary art in the United States, and a nursery for innovative, risk-taking curators and directors who would go on to become forces in the art world generally, including Kathy Halbreich (MoMA), Philippe Vergne (L.A. MOCA), and Peter Eleey (PS1), who once stated he got his best ideas in the Walker library. In recent years the artist’s book has come to acquire a kind of celebrity status in the museum world, with modern and contemporary museum exhibits regularly including vitrines with examples of the genre, and with so many established artists producing them.

Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 11.13.14 PM

Assemblage.  Rosemary Furtak.  Mixed media, 2003

Many if not most of the works in “Misbehaving” testify to a conscious identification between the early outsider status of the artist’s book and the outsider status of women in the art world, and in the culture in general. Little wonder that a genre that is edgy by nature and that had its origins in subverting conventional currents of verbal and material exchange should be taken as an expressive medium by a group of artists whose voices are usually treated as out-of-place: sometimes tolerated but rarely supported or celebrated. Furtak’s own piece, “Assemblage,” which forms the centerpiece of our exhibit, is emblematic here. A readymade composition of found objects, the work consists of an otherwise empty cigar box containing an invitation to an Ellen von Unwerth exhibition depicting two fashionable and bare-shouldered young women. Both women are masked and show a gloved hand, one of lace and the other of leather, the latter with an index finger to her lips suggesting secrecy and misbehavior. The whole forms a kind of clasped book with a surprise inside: the surprise of women discovered hiding in a man’s space, the last place a man might expect to find them, and, perhaps, in this context, a reformulation of the librarian’s stereotypical shush. The piece more than holds its own with the other works in the exhibit, and silently speaks volumes about those works, about the place of women in the world in general and the art world in particular, and about Furtak’s own professional practice. For the space in which she created her library and her own influence upon the art world was much like this cigar box. Furtak was not openly supported by her institution in her artists’ book collecting. To create the collection she had to divert, somewhat surreptitiously, money from her annual book budget to buy artists’ books, so that, essentially, over a period of twenty-nine years she built the entire collection by scrounging. Furtak was never given curator status, and paid poorly even for a librarian, which as a women’s profession is traditionally undercompensated. To make ends meet she spent the early part of her career babysitting on evenings and weekends, often for the Director who hired her. Later she worked a second job as an usher and finally coffee-bar attendant at Minneapolis’ Symphony Hall.

Screen Shot 2015-04-01 at 11.13.59 PM

Gynecology. Joan Lyons. 1989.

Small wonder then that in her personal collecting Rosemary Furtak acquired so many works by women artists, under-represented and so often, like herself, practiced in hiding their accomplishments in plain sight. Collectively the works in this exhibit remind us that we can aid and influence others and accomplish much good even in the context of such constraints, that the cultural conversations that determine how we engage the world and one another can be carried forward, even if spoken in low tones and in spaces we occupy only marginally, perhaps toward the eventual unraveling of these limitations. Most of the works on view in this show are destined after its closing to go into the National Museum of Women in the Arts in Washington, D.C., an institution devoted to deploying and promoting art by women toward just this outcome.

Thomas Hill,

Art Librarian

The Susan B. Anthony papers: suffrage, abolition, organizing

New digital collection available!

The Slavery question is the All-absorbing one of the day…

— Susan B. Anthony to Bestey Voorhees, June 28, 1854 [1]

Susan B. Anthony, n.d. Bain News Service, publisher. Courtesy Library of Congress. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ggbain.30124

Vassar’s Susan B. Anthony digital collection, containing 100 items (and more than 300 pages) of writings to and from the famous suffragist and abolitionist, is now available online.  While Anthony is perhaps best known for her work in obtaining voting rights for women, she was also heavily involved in anti-slavery efforts, and Vassar’s collection provides insights into Anthony’s work in the pre-Civil War abolitionist movement.  It also shows Anthony’s incredible talents for organizing political movements and bringing their causes to the forefront of local, state, and national conversations.  Materials include letters to and from noted abolitionists Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton (who, similar to Anthony, worked for abolitionist and suffrage causes).

Those interested in political organization, grassroots movements, funding, and networking will be particularly interested in Anthony’s writings.  For example, her March 8, 1859 letter to William Lloyd Garrison describes her goal to organize and inspire abolitionists in New York through better connection to voters and legislators.  As she writes from Albany, N.Y.:

“I have written Greely [Horace Greeley, the editor of the New-York Tribune] & asked him if he would not publish the petition & tell the readers of the Tribune of the fact that their noises should be heard at the Capitol … We must have some working centre here in New York – Gerit Smith [Gerritt Smith, see 3] says he has been giving time & money, in a quiet way – & so have others, but the trouble is it is so very quiet, nobody knows or feels it – We have the Material to be worked up into genuine anti Slavery – We lack only the faithful, earnest home workers -” [2].

Closeup of page 1, Anthony, Susan B. -- to William Lloyd Garrison, [Mar 8, 1859]

Closeup of page 1, Anthony, Susan B. — to William Lloyd Garrison, [Mar 8, 1859]

Anthony’s early letters are filled with similar references to organization, “working centers,” and creating networks and media outlets to make others aware of abolitionist movements in New York.  Her later letters shift focus to suffrage, but continue to show her incredible political organizing skills.  For example, she delivers persuasive speeches about suffrage and continues to publish as widely as possible about votes for all, but also writes to congressman Thomas C. Powell on Oct. 22, 1876:

Closeup of page 2, Anthony, Susan B. -- to Thomas C. Powell, Oct 22, 1876

Closeup of page 2, Anthony, Susan B. — to Thomas C. Powell, Oct 22, 1876

“Because of my United States citizenship I am entitled to a voice in the government of the nation, the state, the county, the town & the city in which I chance to reside… and I hope you will see this point & thus urge it in your debates- – and when you shall see a form of petition to Congress for a 16th Amendment I hope you will circulate it and collect a great many names.”[4, emphasis added]

She later writes to “Dear Sir” (by context, most likely another congressman) in January 1884 in a similar vein, asking politely but pointedly about preparing for a national vote on women’s suffrage:

Anthony, Susan B. -- to "Dear Sir," Jan 18, 1884

Anthony, Susan B. — to “Dear Sir,” Jan 18, 1884

“Will you kindly tell me if you would have voted for the resolution for a Select Committee on Woman Suffrage, had you been in the House when the vote was taken Dec. 20? Or rather- would you vote for a Committee if another motion were brought before the House? By answering the above questions you will greatly oblige.” [5]

The collection contains materials from 1854-1905.  Most letters are handwritten and have an accompanying transcript, while others are typewritten. All are full-text searchable and available at http://digitallibrary.vassar.edu/collections/anthony-susan-b.  Vassar’s digital collection provides access to a very large set of Anthony letters.  Other notable collections include the selected documents available through the Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony Papers Project at Rutgers University, the Library of Congress, and of course the extraordinary collection of women’s suffrage materials available at the Schlesinger Library through the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University.  See an excellent writeup about the Schlesinger’s online Susan B. Anthony materials, and read more of Susan B. Anthony’s documents through their site.

Resources

Notes

[1] http://digitallibrary.vassar.edu/islandora/object/vassar:46737

[2] http://digitallibrary.vassar.edu/islandora/object/vassar:46740

[3] Gerrit Smith was Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s cousin, “a founding member of the New York Anti-Slavery Society and a station master on the Underground Railroad.”  National Park Service, “Elizabeth Cady Stanton and the Underground Railroad” http://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/elizabeth-cady-stanton-and-the-underground-railroad.htm

[4] http://digitallibrary.vassar.edu/islandora/object/vassar:46766

[5] http://digitallibrary.vassar.edu/islandora/object/vassar:46774