{"id":3990,"date":"2022-07-05T17:18:59","date_gmt":"2022-07-05T21:18:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/?p=3990"},"modified":"2022-08-08T23:05:26","modified_gmt":"2022-08-09T03:05:26","slug":"working-on-multiplied-childbearing-and-american-empire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/2022\/07\/05\/working-on-multiplied-childbearing-and-american-empire\/","title":{"rendered":"Working on &#8220;Multiplied: Childbearing and American Empire&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">With Heejae Jung\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Our research with Professor Rebecca Edwards examined the phenomenon of \u201chyperfertility,\u201d in which women bore a number of children far higher than the estimated historical \u201cnatural\u201d fertility rate of three to eight children.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> To get a broad, demographic sense of these hyperfertile women, we made use of AncestryLibrary\u2019s search function to access every single woman listed in the 1900 US Federal Census who when asked, \u201cHow many children have you born?\u201d answered twenty or more. We cataloged 3,000 out of a total of more than 3,400 of these women using spreadsheets.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">More than half of the women we encountered were black women born in the South before emancipation\u2014into slavery. A few other women were Mexican immigrants or descendants. Still others were European immigrants. Native-born white women numbered comparatively few. We ran statistics on child survival rates (the percentage of children these mothers reported as still living in 1900, which averaged around 30% across all of the women we recorded), created five-year age cohorts to gauge whether any particular years saw spikes in reproductive labor (possibly correlated to economic recessions or rising slave prices), and generated state maps to recognize any geographic patterns or clusters of interest.<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_4252\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/files\/2022\/07\/nymap.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4252\" class=\"wp-image-4252 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/files\/2022\/07\/nymap-300x284.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"284\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-4252\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Many of the women who resided in New York were clustered in the NYC area. Most of these were immigrants from Europe.<\/p><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the case of rural black Southern women, we discovered a general correlation with maps of the Cotton Belt\u2014the locations of cotton plantations. Heejae conducted a study of the percentages of black women who remained in their birth states, noticing higher persistence rates in certain states over others.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On one of our last days of the project, we explored city directories at the New York Public Library, where we found a predominantly white and male retelling of events. An obituary in Greene County, Alabama, for example, honored the \u201cfather of 26 children\u201d while burying the mother\u2019s name. Looking through the America\u2019s Historical Newspapers database revealed a similar pattern: obituaries frequently honored patriarchs of large families but provided little insight into the mothers who had borne those children.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"><a href=\"http:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/files\/2022\/07\/fordscholars.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-3991\" src=\"http:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/files\/2022\/07\/fordscholars-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/files\/2022\/07\/fordscholars-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/files\/2022\/07\/fordscholars.jpg 512w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">We also searched for stories of individual women and their families. In Heejae\u2019s search for the voices of indigenous women, she examined the Indian-Pioneer Papers, and found the theme of displacement\u2014the lack of knowledge about their mothers\u2019 surnames or their own places of origin\u2014to be prevalent. For example, Rachel Alexander Perryman, a Creek Indian woman and a mother to seventeen children, was described by her daughter as someone who\u00a0 \u201cdid not know when she was born or exactly where &#8211; just some place northwest of Tulsey Town.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Among Black and European immigrant women alike, midwifery served as a form of reproductive resilience and community-building. Due to the lack of accessible and affordable care for expectant mothers from impoverished or marginalized backgrounds, midwives were often not only a necessary but the preferred alternative to doctors. According to Alabama midwife Margaret Charles Smith, midwives were entrusted with the burden of saving and delivering lives while being subjected to intense scrutiny from the public. She wrote, \u201cthe midwife has all the brunt to bear on her. If anything bad happens to the mother, they\u2019re calling you in. The doctor goes there and does what he\u2019s going to do. Gives her a shot and bye-bye. It may do good or it won\u2019t do good, bye-bye. The underground is you working, you deliver the baby, but you aren\u2019t supposed to be there. You don\u2019t have a license to be there. See, they never did allow the midwives to deliver white people. But I did.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Smith\u2019s account of the double standards surrounding assisted childbearing complemented scholarly findings of hyperfertility as both a commonplace and stigmatized practice. Secondary sources further revealed the complex function of female reproduction as an outlet for individuals to project their racist attitudes toward non-white women as \u201cprimitive\u201d beings who unknowingly endangered their children. After the Civil War and the emancipation of slaves, fertility also served as an entry point for people to dispute the sexual objectification of white versus non-white bodies.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another source we looked at was interviews of formerly enslaved people conducted in the 1930s by the WPA Federal Writers\u2019 Project. One interviewee was Laura Clark, an 86-year-old black woman living in Livingston, Alabama. She was one of twenty-two children born by her mother on a plantation in North Carolina. At the age of six or seven, Laura was sold away from her mother alongside ten other unrelated children to an Alabama plantation. She herself had nine living children at the time of the interview, and said, \u201cI had mo\u2019n dat, but some come here dead and some didn\u2019t\u2026 Dey ain\u2019t a graveyard in dis here settlement roun\u2019 Prospect where I ain\u2019t got chillun buried.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Laura Clark\u2019s story reflects the realities of the women who bore large numbers of children: that such reproductive patterns, whether coerced or not, were connected to a demand for labor, and often meant that mothers and children alike suffered disease, injury, and loss to fuel that demand.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With Heejae Jung\u2014 Our research with Professor Rebecca Edwards examined the phenomenon of \u201chyperfertility,\u201d in which women bore a number of children far higher than the estimated historical \u201cnatural\u201d fertility rate of three to eight children. To get a broad, demographic sense of these hyperfertile women, we made use of AncestryLibrary\u2019s search function to access [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8748,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[77508],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ford-2022"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8748"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3990"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3990\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4253,"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3990\/revisions\/4253"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pages.vassar.edu\/fordscholars\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}